The ongoing financial meltdown
in Cyprus has a lot of people asking the same question:
“What do the people that run Europe think
they are doing?”
Many of the current
elites are narrowly educated technocrats who may be brilliant in their own
fields of expertise, but they are incapable of integrating knowledge or ideas across
institutional boundaries. They are not
broadly educated nor have they had earlier experience running large
enterprises. They are careerist technocrats.
In short, they are not all that elite and it is
starting to show. (Hello to
the European Commission and the IMF!)
In the recent past it
was argued that the varying elites who held the reins of power at the local
and national levels easily recognized each other’s interests. The famous sociologist Max Faber observed
that the elites did not even have to meet to consult – they could simply look
out over their areas of influence and recognize the needs and capabilities of
the other members of the elite class.
Put another way, the varying
elites could collectively understand the needs of the industrialists, the
bankers, the ship owners, the politicians, the diplomats and the military
generals. To be sure, they were often
cursed by having a few upper class twits in their circles, but the twits were a
minority.
While competition may
have occurred between the elites, they were usually able to maintain stability
within any given system until the pressures became too great or they failed to
adapt to new advances. (Think Europe from the 1951 European
Steel and Coal Community up to the creation of the Eurozone as a good example).
Even though this
system benefited primarily the elites, the resulting social, political and
economic stability also benefited European society as a whole. Previously and on the other side of the Atlantic, the 19th Century robber
barons of the United States may have been robbers, but they built industry and
infrastructure and did it in such as way that prosperity spread – however unevenly.
A current popular
belief is that a ‘crisis of the elites’ exists and that they are no longer able
to recognize each other’s interests or connect with the society as a
whole. (Hello IMF) Following this logic, it is also
argued that those who believe in “the
superiority of government in the management of the economy – are in a
crisis. Their visions of a more just
society and economic security are being shredded by the stark reality that the
governments they run are running out of money.”
The ability to react
to these issues is driven by the fact that the financial elites have become the
new aristocracy and they have seized control of the financial system and the political system. Lacking a
broad education or world view, they shape the financial system to meet their
own needs and wants at the cost of everyone else. There is no collective elite - simply a financial elite which everyone else must serve.
Eventually this will
lead to a collapse, as a system that only meets the needs of one set of financial
elites will fail when it simply inverts due to too much wealth at the top and
not enough at the bottom. The financial elites will be shocked when this happens as they will not see it coming.
The Davos Foundation –
(of all groups!!!) has recognized that
a problem exists and warned the world’s elites of a dystopian future that
awaits if changes are not made. The following
is an extract from their 2012 risk report. When those who advise the super
elites make these kinds of comments, maybe we should all take note.
Case 1: Seeds of Dystopia
Dystopia, the opposite of a utopia, describes a place where life is full
of hardship and devoid of hope. Analysis of linkages across various global
risks reveals a constellation of fiscal, demographic and societal risks
signalling a dystopian future for much of humanity. The interplay among these
risks could result in a world where a large youth population contends with
chronic, high levels of unemployment, while concurrently, the largest
population of retirees in history becomes dependent upon already heavily
indebted governments. Both young and old could face an income gap, as well as a
skills gap so wide as to threaten social and political stability.
This case underscores the danger that could arise if declining economic
conditions jeopardize the social contracts between states and citizens. In the
absence of viable alternatives, this could precipitate a downward spiral of the
global economy fuelled by protectionism, nationalism and populism.
See the 2012 Davos
Risk report at: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalRisks_Report_2012.pdf
See also Christopher L. Hayes Twilight of the Elites: The Crisis of
Authority in American Life, 2012, Random House, Inc and the Forbes Magazine
article Greece And The Crisis Of The
Governing Elite, 9/19/2011. http://www.forbes.com/sites/charleskadlec/2011/09/19/greece-and-the-crisis-of-the-governing-elite/
No comments:
Post a Comment